Criminal law reform was approved by the Constitutional Council, in an article on

AFP | AFP -

The Constitutional Council approved Thursday UMP complaint challenging the constitutionality of the abolition of criminal justice reform, illegal restriction in the future, but increased penalties Article retouching.

Finally, the Parliament adopted on July 17 of criminal justice reform, aimed primarily at the relapse into criminal matters.

In particular, criminal restraint, has a new proposal in an open area (outside) and the Damned, a series of bonds (social and judicial probation, community service) and restrictions (common is conducted, are created at certain places and certain people) from that for the condemnation of competent judges.

The members of the UMP group in the National Assembly, in particular the application of the provisions and conditions of this criminal coercion was not sufficiently defined, and the powers of the judge was too large for the implementation of this system.

Ways rejected this argument and stated in the relevant articles.

Besides these two positions examined ex officio by section three of the secondary, which is automatically 10% of the penalties imposed and some of the customs penalties by administrative authorities.

This growth has the introduction of the Legal Committee of the National Assembly of the Socialist MPs and Nathalie Martin Nieson Carrillon Couvreur initiative should help done the financing of the victims.

The Constitutional Council ruled that the automatic nature of this growth, or "too good", against the principle of individual records. In fact, "to a court or competent authority (not) taking into account the special circumstances of the case," he said of his decision.

Therefore, it is advisable to this article should be declared unconstitutional.