The second part of the debate around the question: What is the social history of the First World War? Emmanuel Saint-Nicolas Marriott Fuscien and discuss the unity of the trenches. Was transformed social relations? Had to fight existing hierarchies? Two emergency plan without the irreconcilable, to draw a very different picture of the Great War.
Centenary of the First World War to compensate not only a lot of opportunity for unforgettable events, but also the historical sciences. Two researchers, historians, sociologist Nonfiction.fr offer this debate, put our knowledge of the authorities and the cohesion of the conflict through the trenches. Hairy, the most important figure in the Centenario, the events of the disagreements among the troops? What was the impact of differences between social classes? Homogenization? Keep a distance? Emmanuel Saint-Fuscien, professor at the EHESS and Nicola Marriott, Director of Research at the CNRS, to answer this question.
The first part, two researchers at the opportunity to be more than a debate that led to the historiography of the past 10 years, the soldiers conducted a "commitment" or "consent".
On the other hand, Emmanuel Saint-Nicolas Marriott Fuscien and discuss the unity of the trenches. Was transformed social relations? Had to fight existing hierarchies? Two emergency plan without the irreconcilable, to draw a very different picture of the Great War.
Nonfiction.fr: in the middle of the two studies is the question of unity in the trenches - a hierarchical relationship on the one hand, the social inequality that is the front (...) Read more on Slate.fr
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire